Lifestyle Medicine QBank

Clinical processes practice questions for the lifestyle medicine boards

Clinical processes is about running lifestyle medicine as care: assessment, guidelines, team-based and group models, measurement and quality improvement.

ABLM exam domain: Key Clinical Processes in Lifestyle Medicine

8%of the ABLM exam
~12of 150 physician questions
~10of 120 health professional questions
193questions on this domain in the bank

What the exam expects you to know

ABLM builds the exam on the lifestyle medicine core competencies. For this domain they include:

High-yield areas

How to study it

Expect practical scenarios: a clinic wants to start group visits, a patient's glucose falls on a new diet, a QI project needs a measure. Pick the answer that is safe, measurable and feasible.

Free practice questions: Clinical processes

4 questions from the bank, with the full rationale and source. Pick your answer, then open the rationale.

Question 1 of 4 · easyKey Clinical Processes in Lifestyle Medicine

A 76-year-old man with chronic pain and anxiety takes oxycodone, lorazepam and gabapentin. He has fallen twice despite rehabilitation. There is no recent dose change or acute illness. Each medicine has a documented indication, but the team is reviewing the regimen’s cumulative risk. Which strategy best addresses the Beers Criteria concern about concurrent CNS-active drugs?

  1. Plan a monitored reduction in CNS-active classes with symptom follow-up
  2. Replace lorazepam with zolpidem while retaining the other two drug classes
  3. Replace gabapentin with pregabalin while retaining the other two drug classes
  4. Move the three drug doses to bedtime while retaining the current daily exposure
  5. Replace oxycodone with tramadol while retaining the other two drug classes
Show answer and rationale

Answer: A. Plan a monitored reduction in CNS-active classes with symptom follow-up

A. Correct: Beers highlights increased fall and fracture risk with three or more listed CNS-active classes. Review benefits and risks and, when feasible, reduce concurrent classes through a coordinated, monitored plan; opioid/benzodiazepine and opioid/gabapentinoid combinations also carry specific risks. B. Incorrect: A Z-drug remains within the relevant CNS-active classes and has fall-related risks; this substitution does not remove the cumulative class burden. C. Incorrect: Pregabalin remains a gabapentinoid, so substituting it does not reduce the number of interacting CNS-active classes. D. Incorrect: Timing alone does not remove CNS effects or the class-based interaction and may add nocturnal fall risk. E. Incorrect: Tramadol remains an opioid and introduces its own risks; substituting within the class does not resolve the three-class concern.

Source: AGS Beers Criteria (2023), Table 5, any combination of three or more CNS-active drugs/classes; opioid-benzodiazepine and opioid-gabapentinoid rows. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12478568/

Question 2 of 4 · moderateKey Clinical Processes in Lifestyle Medicine

A 60-year-old man on insulin reports that he no longer notices glucose values of 45-55 mg/dL during an intensive lifestyle program. His spouse has twice helped him treat a low. Which strategy is most appropriate?

  1. Tighten targets to restore awareness more quickly
  2. Continue current doses and wait for symptoms to return
  3. Reduce CGM use to avoid treating asymptomatic lows
  4. Add bedtime carbohydrate without reassessing therapy
  5. Relax targets temporarily and prevent further lows
Show answer and rationale

Answer: E. Relax targets temporarily and prevent further lows

Recurrent hypoglycemia can blunt warning symptoms. Avoiding further hypoglycemia through treatment adjustment, monitoring and structured education can help restore awareness. A: Further hypoglycemia can worsen impaired awareness. B: Preventing recurrent lows is part of restoring awareness. C: Reduced monitoring does not correct the physiological problem. D: A snack alone does not reliably address recurring excessive treatment exposure. E: Correct: avoidance of hypoglycemia is a key part of restoring awareness.

Source: ADA Professional Practice Committee. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises. Standards of Care in Diabetes 2026, section 6. Recommendations 6.11 and 6.18-6.19. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12690178/

Question 3 of 4 · easyKey Clinical Processes in Lifestyle Medicine

A clinician updates a dementia-risk assessment form after reading the 2024 Lancet Commission. The form already includes hearing loss and the other factors in the 2020 model. Which additional sensory finding belongs in the updated risk assessment?

  1. Uncorrected impairment of visual acuity
  2. Persistent reduction in odor identification
  3. Intermittent tinnitus with normal audiometry
  4. Loss of distal vibration and position sensation
  5. Persistent reduction in taste discrimination
Show answer and rationale

Answer: A. Uncorrected impairment of visual acuity

A. Correct: Uncorrected vision impairment was added as a potentially modifiable risk factor in 2024, alongside high LDL cholesterol. Assessing and treating vision problems also improves current function. B. Incorrect: Olfactory impairment can be associated with neurodegenerative disease but was not one of the newly added potentially modifiable factors in that model. C. Incorrect: Tinnitus without hearing loss was not the newly added sensory risk factor; hearing impairment was already included. D. Incorrect: Peripheral sensory loss can affect safety and function but was not the new sensory exposure in the 2024 model. E. Incorrect: Taste impairment was not added to the modeled risk-factor set. This distinction does not mean it has no clinical importance.

Source: Livingston G et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. Lancet. 2024;404:572-628. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0. Summary and Key messages: new evidence supports adding vision impairment and high LDL cholesterol to the 12 risk factors from 2020; make screening and treatment for vision impairment accessible. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01296-0

Question 4 of 4 · easyKey Clinical Processes in Lifestyle Medicine

At the third session of an EPIC-style diabetes group clinic, a 59-year-old man reports that he dropped his action plan to 'walk more in the evenings' when his employer moved him to evening shifts. He still wants to be more active. The facilitator helps him revise the plan using the goal-quality criteria taught in EPIC. Which revised plan best meets those criteria?

  1. Walk 20 minutes after waking on my four workdays; review in 3 weeks
  2. Be more active whenever my new shift schedule allows, starting this week
  3. Walk 60 minutes a day starting tomorrow to make up for missed weeks
  4. Bring my HbA1c below 7% by the next session, three weeks from now
  5. Walk 20 minutes after work on evenings when I have energy left
Show answer and rationale

Answer: A. Walk 20 minutes after waking on my four workdays; review in 3 weeks

A (correct): EPIC taught that high-quality goals are specific with measurable steps, challenging yet realistic, and set with deadlines that allow reflection and feedback. This plan is specific and measurable, fits his new schedule, and has a review point, which continues the action-plan feedback cycle. B (incorrect): This is vague and not measurable, which EPIC described as a low-quality goal that does not lead to attainment. C (incorrect): The plan is specific, but jumping to an hour daily after weeks of inactivity and a schedule change is not realistic, and EPIC warned against unreachable standards. D (incorrect): This is an outcome target rather than an action plan, and a large HbA1c change within three weeks is not realistic or within his direct control. E (incorrect): Walking after work repeats the timing that just failed with evening shifts, and making it conditional on energy leaves it neither specific nor measurable.

Source: Naik AD, Palmer N, Petersen NJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(5):453-459. Appendix, Session 2 How to make Diabetes Goals and Action Plans (principles: specific and measurable, challenging yet realistic, deadlines with reflection and feedback); Session 4 Action Plan Feedback and Review. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3132209/

For exam preparation only, not clinical advice.

Practice all 193 questions in this domain

The full bank has 1,661 questions across all ten domains, timed physician and health professional mock exams, and your accuracy by domain. $149 USD, one time, with a pass-or-refund guarantee. Launch price through October 31, 2026, then $249.

Other exam domains

Read the exam guide: format, eligibility, fees and a six-week study plan