Nutrition practice questions for the lifestyle medicine boards
Nutrition is the largest domain on the lifestyle medicine boards. Expect dietary-pattern evidence, label reading, prescriptions for specific diseases and nutrient questions for special populations.
ABLM exam domain: Nutrition Science, Assessment and Prescription
26%of the ABLM exam
~39of 150 physician questions
~31of 120 health professional questions
416questions on this domain in the bank
What the exam expects you to know
ABLM builds the exam on the lifestyle medicine core competencies. For this domain they include:
Assessing food intake patterns and nutrients of deficit and excess
Reading food labels and judging the health impact of ingredients
Common messages across global dietary guidelines
Health effects of plant-predominant and other dietary patterns, and of food processing
Nutrition evidence for preventing, treating and reversing hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, prediabetes, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and cancer
Writing evidence-based nutrition prescriptions, culinary medicine, and when to refer to a registered dietitian
High-yield areas
Landmark trials and what they actually showed: PREDIMED, the Diabetes Prevention Program, DiRECT, the Lyon Diet Heart Study, DASH and DASH-Sodium, and the Lifestyle Heart Trial
Saturated fat, dietary cholesterol, fiber and LDL cholesterol
Sodium and nutrient-content claims on labels
Ultra-processed food and the NOVA classification
Micronutrient risks: B12 with plant-based diets or metformin, and deficiencies after bariatric surgery
Pregnancy, infancy, older adults and other special populations
How to study it
Learn the trials by their design and primary outcome, not just their names. Many questions hinge on what a study did or did not show. Then practice turning evidence into a specific prescription a patient could follow.
Free practice questions: Nutrition
4 questions from the bank, with the full rationale and source. Pick your answer, then open the rationale.
Question 1 of 4 · easyNutrition Science, Assessment and Prescription
A healthy breastfed infant is approaching 6 months of age, is growing well and shows developmental readiness for solids. The parent plans to wait until 12 months because breast milk seems sufficient. Which advice follows the 2023 WHO complementary feeding guideline?
Wait until 12 months, since growth is currently normal
Start iron-fortified infant cereal alone and add other foods after 9 months
Start complementary foods and plan to stop breastfeeding at 12 months
Begin with 100% fruit juice to introduce new tastes
Introduce complementary foods at 6 months while continuing to breastfeed
Show answer and rationale
Answer: E. Introduce complementary foods at 6 months while continuing to breastfeed
A (incorrect): WHO recommends introducing complementary foods at 6 months (180 days); normal growth so far does not justify a 12-month delay. B (incorrect): WHO calls for a diverse diet including daily animal-source foods and fruits and vegetables, and advises minimizing reliance on starchy staples. C (incorrect): WHO recommends continuing breastfeeding up to 2 years or beyond. D (incorrect): WHO advises limiting 100% fruit juice; it is not an appropriate first food. E (correct): WHO Recommendation 3 is introduction of complementary foods at 6 months while continuing to breastfeed (strong recommendation).
Source: WHO. WHO Guideline for complementary feeding of infants and young children 6-23 months of age. Geneva: WHO; 2023. ISBN 9789240081864. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/373358 Locator: Executive summary, Recommendations 1, 3, 4 and 5, pp. x to xii.
Question 2 of 4 · hardNutrition Science, Assessment and Prescription
A research team plans a diet study in adults aged 40 to 69 years and must choose between food frequency questionnaires and 24-hour recalls. They review the OPEN study, which compared both instruments against doubly labeled water and urinary nitrogen biomarkers. Which conclusion is best supported by that study?
Both instruments estimated absolute energy intake within about 5% of measured expenditure
Underreporting of energy was larger on 24-hour recalls than on FFQs in both men and women
Protein was overreported, offsetting energy underreporting
FFQs underreported energy more, yet percent energy from protein was little biased
Women underreported energy intake substantially less than men did on both instruments
Show answer and rationale
Answer: D. FFQs underreported energy more, yet percent energy from protein was little biased
A (incorrect): Both instruments underreported energy. Men underreported by 12 to 14% on 24-hour recalls and 31 to 36% on FFQs; women by 16 to 20% and 34 to 38%.
B (incorrect): The reverse is true; FFQ underreporting was roughly two to three times larger than 24-hour recall underreporting.
C (incorrect): Protein intake was also underreported compared with the urinary nitrogen biomarker, by about 11 to 15% on recalls and 27 to 34% on FFQs.
D (correct): Underreporting of energy and protein was much larger on FFQs than on 24-hour recalls, yet there was little underreporting of the percentage of energy from protein. Energy-adjusted measures were therefore less biased than absolute intakes.
E (incorrect): Women's energy underreporting was similar to or somewhat larger than men's on both instruments (16 to 20% versus 12 to 14% on recalls).
Source: Subar AF, et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(1):1-13. Abstract: underreporting percentages for energy and protein by sex on 24HRs and FFQs versus doubly labeled water and urinary nitrogen; 'There was little underreporting of the percentage of energy from protein'. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12835280/
Question 3 of 4 · easyNutrition Science, Assessment and Prescription
A 34-year-old woman without diabetes has a BMI of 29 kg/m2. To lose weight she switched from regular cola to a sucralose-sweetened diet cola and now plans to replace the sugar in her coffee with stevia packets. She asks what the World Health Organization advises about these products. Which statement best reflects the 2023 WHO guideline on non-sugar sweeteners?
Stevia is exempt because it is a naturally derived sweetener
The advice is aimed mainly at adults who already have diabetes
WHO advises against using them as a means of weight control
Sugar alcohols such as erythritol fall under the same advice
It is a strong recommendation based on high-certainty trials
Show answer and rationale
Answer: C. WHO advises against using them as a means of weight control
A (incorrect): Incorrect. The recommendation covers synthetic and naturally occurring or modified non-nutritive sweeteners, and WHO lists stevia and stevia derivatives among the products it includes.
B (incorrect): Incorrect. The guideline Remarks state it is relevant for everyone, including children and pregnant and lactating women, except individuals with existing diabetes, who were outside its scope; she is therefore within it.
C (correct): Correct. WHO recommends against the use of non-sugar sweeteners to control body weight or reduce noncommunicable disease risk, because the evidence suggests no long-term benefit in reducing body fat. Reducing the sweetness of the diet overall, with unsweetened beverages or foods with naturally occurring sugars such as fruit, is the suggested alternative.
D (incorrect): Incorrect. WHO states that the recommendation does not apply to low-calorie sugars and sugar alcohols (polyols), which contain calories and are not classified as non-sugar sweeteners.
E (incorrect): Incorrect. The guideline wording is "WHO suggests that non-sugar sweeteners not be used" (conditional recommendation), based on low-certainty evidence overall; the possibility of confounding and reverse causation in the observational data led to a conservative, conditional rating.
Source: World Health Organization. Use of non-sugar sweeteners: WHO guideline. Geneva: WHO; 2023 (NCBI Bookshelf NBK592246), with WHO news release of 15 May 2023. Recommendation and supporting information: 'WHO suggests that non-sugar sweeteners not be used as a means of achieving weight control or reducing the risk of noncommunicable diseases (conditional recommendation)'; Rationale (low-certainty evidence overall); Remarks (applies to everyone except individuals with existing diabetes; includes stevia and stevia derivatives; does not apply to low-calorie sugars and sugar alcohols). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592246/
Question 4 of 4 · moderateNutrition Science, Assessment and Prescription
A prenatal clinic following WHO antenatal care recommendations is writing its routine protocol for a healthy pregnant patient without anaemia. Which daily oral regimen does WHO recommend to prevent maternal anaemia and related adverse outcomes?
Elemental iron 120 mg plus folic acid 2800 micrograms
Elemental iron 60 mg plus folic acid 4 mg
Elemental iron 300 mg plus folic acid 400 micrograms
Folic acid 400 micrograms, adding iron only if anaemia develops
Elemental iron 30-60 mg plus folic acid 400 micrograms
Show answer and rationale
Answer: E. Elemental iron 30-60 mg plus folic acid 400 micrograms
A (incorrect): 120 mg iron with 2800 micrograms folic acid is the WHO once-weekly intermittent regimen, not a daily dose. B (incorrect): The routine WHO regimen uses 400 micrograms folic acid; 4 mg is a high-dose regimen for specific neural tube defect risk, not routine prevention. C (incorrect): 300 mg is the mass of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate that provides about 60 mg of elemental iron; 300 mg elemental iron is far above the recommendation. D (incorrect): WHO recommends daily iron with folic acid for pregnant women, not iron only after anaemia is diagnosed. E (correct): WHO recommendation A.2.1 is daily oral iron and folic acid with 30-60 mg elemental iron and 400 micrograms folic acid to prevent maternal anaemia, puerperal sepsis, low birth weight and preterm birth.
Source: WHO. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: executive summary (WHO/RHR/16.12), 2016. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/250800 Locator: Table 1, recommendations A.2.1 (daily oral iron 30-60 mg elemental iron and 400 ug folic acid) and A.2.2 with footnotes, p. 3.
For exam preparation only, not clinical advice.
Practice all 416 questions in this domain
The full bank has 1,661 questions across all ten domains, timed physician and health professional mock exams, and your accuracy by domain. $149 USD, one time, with a pass-or-refund guarantee. Launch price through October 31, 2026, then $249.